Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 17:11, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Ah, point. Hmm. I don't think the gnome-core package is useful anymore;
> > it conflicts with the GNOME 2 stuff. We should have it removed from the
> > archive. Christian, do you agree?
>
> This will remove gnome-core from testing too ? Not really a good idea.
The ftpmasters said that since many other packages depend on gnome-core
in testing, removing it from unstable wouldn't remove it from testing.
So Christian, do you think you could ask for the removal?
Reply to:
- References:
- Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Ross Burton <ross@burtonini.com>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>