Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 16:35, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> That might be confusing, as there is an upstream package called
> 'gnome-desktop' (and indeed, Debian has some libgnome-desktop and
> gnome-desktop-* packages).
Right.
> This may be a dumb (and quite off-topic) question, but why do you need
> virtual packages when we have a tasks system?
Well, basically the tasks people didn't want to maintain the detailed
list of packages.
Reply to:
- References:
- Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Ross Burton <ross@burtonini.com>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: Debian GNOME Policy, Mark II
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com>