Re: Workrave anyone?
>>>>> On 19 Feb 2003 12:30:33 -0500, Sean Middleditch
>>>>> <email@example.com> was rumoured to have said:
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 11:55, Ross Burton wrote:
>> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 15:32, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>> > Now, I asked the upstream author if it wasn't time to get Workrave
>> > into Debian. He responded, he thinks that the policy doesn't permit
>> > the upstream author and maintainer to be one and the same person. Is
>> > this true? If yes, why?
>> No, it doesn't say this. That would be rather stupid...
>> I'll take this oppurtunity to plug DrWright, a no-frills program similar
>> to Workrave but without the complex configuration. Compare
>> http://workrave.sourceforge.net/gfx/prefs-timers.png to
> Ugh - if that Workrave screenshot is recent, someone should file a bug
> that they aren't HIG compliant in the least, either. I just tried, but
> I'm not going thru the effort of creating Yet Another Bugzilla Account
> for one little app I never use. ;-)
Workrave is not part of GNOME2, so I don't see why non-compliance to
GNOME's HIG is a bug. Do you think authors of unrelated (but perhaps
GNOME-aware) software should be pressured into doing gnome-type UIs
Am I missing something here?
> Sean Middleditch <firstname.lastname@example.org>