On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 10:41:01AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:00:11AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > As far as I know, we don't have an XML catalog at all, so yes, that > > would probably make it not standards compliant... > > There is already a bug report against libxml2 for this, but apparently > the libxml2 maintainer does not feel responsible for maintaining a xml > catalog. > > So, what would it take to obtain a libxml2 catalog ? Whose > responsability is it [...] to package it ? there is some discussion about this on the debian-sgml list [1], i think. progress is being made, albeit slowly. also, that list is probably the best place to ask question about xml catalog registration, as the people there are fairly knowledgeable about it. [1] see http://lists.debian.org/debian-sgml/2002/debian-sgml-200212/msg00001.html -- gram
Attachment:
pgpB27EU7WItg.pgp
Description: PGP signature