[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME 1 ABI involving libpng



On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:37:33AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Since when an user should install a chrooot environment to install a
> package ? This is unacceptable.
> 
> [...]
> > will be unique in being the only distro with libgdk-pixbuf3 for gnome1.  The
> > soname of the library is for upstream to set, not for packagers to muddle
> > with, if one cares about compatibility.
> Anyway this will be the latest gdk-pixbuf upstream tarball for G1, then
> there is no importance to change the libraries soname.

I can't believe you're dismissing this with such arguments.
I'll repeat what Ryan said: it is NOT your job to invent sonames. That
is upstream's job. It is also not cool to make Debian 3.1's GNOME1
incompatible with every other.

Can you not see this is a very important breakage, and not being able to
install two -dev packages isn't?

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom,
   aka Oskuro in    || jordi@sindominio.net      || Using Debian GNU/Linux
 Reinos de Leyenda  || jordi@debian.org          || http://www.debian.org/

http://sindominio.net  GnuPG public information:      pub  1024D/917A225E 
telnet pusa.uv.es 23   73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC  2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E

Attachment: pgp8HWyPTYVrc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: