Hi Joe,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:47:20PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> Yeah, but we *are* running unstable. :)
But there is no need to break things consciously!
We should at least have a plan before we start
a huge mess in unstable. I suggest we do not upload
any further GNOME-2 packages to unstable, until
we have at least some transition plan.
Of course each developer could start the transition
avalanche by replacing his packages in unstable with
GNOME-2 versions. But breaking GNOME-1.4 in unstable
before most GNOME package maintainers agree to that is
somewhat rude in my opinion.
I would suggest to take my draft at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2002/debian-gtk-gnome-200206/msg00187.html
as base. What do you think about this? We could improve
this draft until it is somewhat better and then use the
improved version as a guideline.
What do you think?
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
Attachment:
pgplTYtCfYps9.pgp
Description: PGP signature