Re: Gnome 2 summary 27/06/2002
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:16:25AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> So, I strongly agree with the earlier discussion that involved conflicting
> package-name2 packages sitting alongside their package-name GNOME 1.x
> friends in unstable. Later on, when the integration/migration issues have
> been resolved, the packages can be renamed.
That sounds eminently sensible, to me.
> I don't believe that pinning
> packages is a workable solution (I've never pinned a package, and I don't
> believe I should be required to do so, unless Debian suddenly adopted a
> "let's be a complete pigsty and not an integrated, sensible distribution"
> policy, which would shock and amaze me).
Agree 100%
There is a disturbing trend of some posters here to regard the
distribution name "unstable" as an invitation to actively make it so.
I really don't understand that mentality.
-S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: