Re: Gnome 2 summary 27/06/2002
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 16:50, Colin Walters wrote:
> Most importantly, we have to consider upgrades from woody. jdub said
> that upstream doesn't have any plan yet for transitioning user settings,
> and I think we should at least attempt to do this.
Red Hat and Ximian will definitely be concentrating on this. Getting
GNOME 2 packages in unstable will definitely increase the number of eyes
on them, and increase quality in the long run. I personally plan to
upload the GNOME 2 version of gedit soon-ish (i.e., once I make it); I
hope other maintainers follow suit.
After all, it's not called unstable for nothing, right?
Hopefully, the transition mechanisms which are introduced in later
versions of GNOME 2 packages will also function for us users who will
use versions of GNOME 2 prior to the transition mechanism-enabled
versions.
--
Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net> <drew@debian.org>
Please encrypt email sent to me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: