Hi Nico, To get netcdf-cxx-legacy moving (it will take a while through the NEW queue), I just filed an ITP bug and an RFS bug and hopefully Bas will be able to sponsor the upload soon. I hope you don't mind. This is a bit cheeky as it is all yours and Bas's work. If you need help to get through the ITP/RFS process next time just sing out. You were at the final hurdle! Regards, Ross On 06/18/2015 09:17 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Ah okay, I had been under the impression that the new C++ interface will > be called `libnetcdfcxx`. If both bear the same name, one is encouraged > to look up the difference though. This should be fine. > > --Nico > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:55 PM Sebastiaan Couwenberg > <sebastic@xs4all.nl <mailto:sebastic@xs4all.nl>> wrote: > > On 06/18/2015 08:25 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > Not sure if this is a good idea. After all, the currently > developed C++ > > interface is called `netcdf-cxx4` on the Unidata side, see [1]. If the > > legacy version goes by the same name on Debian, one may easily get > confused. > > I don't think the similar binary package names are a problem. > > The dependencies generated with the help of the symbols files will make > sure the correct library will be used. > > The package description synopsis differentiate the two C++ libraries: > > Package: libnetcdf-c++4-1 > Description: C++ interface for scientific data access to large > binary data > > Package: libnetcdf-c++4 > Description: legacy NetCDF C++ interface > > We may want to change the synopsis or extended description for -legacy > to mention NetCDF-3 explicitly. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature