[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: [Orfeo Toolbox (OTB) 0000981]: Please add licences



Sébastien,

You don't have to use the machine readable format, but all licenses
must be discussed.
If eg boost is present under Utilities/BGL you should add the boost license.

Since we are writing a new copyright file it makes sense to use the
machine readable format immediately:

Files: Utilities/BGL
Copyright: xxx
License:BSL-1.0

This being said: I have said this before, but I would repackage otb
for debian (easy to do by adding Files-Excluded to the copyright file)
and remove all the code we don't use so we don't have to create (and
maintain) a copyright file for it. It is also a good way to ensure we
are really using the debian version of the libraries and not our own.

Reading through debian/rules I see:
USE_EXTERNAL_BOOST, USE_EXTERNAL_GDAL, USE_EXTERNAL_OSSIM, USE_EXTERNAL_EXPAT

Those could already be removed.
But then the job is not done, many others are listed under
Utilities/ITK/Modules/ThirdParty/ and in other places. If we
distribute them, they should be in the copyright file.

Definitely all licenses should be there, I'm not sure about what one
should write for copyright. Listing everyone does not seem that useful
to me.

Johan

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Sebastien Dinot <sebastien.dinot@c-s.fr> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Le 28/10/2014 14:51, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> This grunt work simply needs to be done by somebody who cares for
>> the Debian package.
>
> I am the original author of the OTB package for Ubuntu. I met Andreas in
> july during the Libre Software Meeting (LSM) after he started the
> refactoring of my work with the aim of having a Debian GIS compliant
> package. Andreas listed me some remaining issues and tasks but I had no time
> to achieve them so far.
>
> Yes, the current debian/copyright file is not machine-readable but according
> to this page:
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>
> the use of this specification is optional.
>
> But if it is a requirement, I will try to provide such machine-readable file
> in the next weeks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sébastien
>
> --
> Sébastien Dinot
> Expert logiciel libre
> CS Systèmes d’Information — BU Espace et Renseignement
> Parc de la Grande Plaine — 5, rue Brindejonc des Moulinais — BP 15872
> 31506 Toulouse Cedex 05 — France
> +33 (0)5 61 17 64 48 — sebastien.dinot@c-s.fr
>


Reply to: