Re: Fwd: [Orfeo Toolbox (OTB) 0000981]: Please add licences
Hi Paolo,
I think the missunderstanding remains here: The problem is not the
licensing of the code but rather that all the licenses need to be
specified in the file debian/copyright. This is *no* upstream but
rather a packaging issue which can be simply solved by firing up $EDITOR
and add the license statements of all files that do not licensed as
License: CeCILL but something else.
This grunt work simply needs to be done by somebody who cares for
the Debian package.
Hope this clarifies things
Andreas.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 07:14:47AM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> FYI
> Authoritative opinion would, I think, be welcomed by OTB devs.
> Thanks.
>
>
> - -------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
> Oggetto: [Orfeo Toolbox (OTB) 0000981]: Please add licences
> Data: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:06:05 +0100
> Mittente: Mantis Bug Tracker <bugs@orfeo-toolbox.org>
> A: cavallini@faunalia.it
>
>
> A NOTE has been added to this issue.
> ======================================================================
> http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981
> ======================================================================
> Reported By: pcav
> Assigned To:
> ======================================================================
> Project: Orfeo Toolbox (OTB)
> Issue ID: 981
> Category: General
> Reproducibility: always
> Severity: major
> Priority: urgent
> Status: new
> ======================================================================
> Date Submitted: 2014-10-18 07:04 CEST
> Last Modified: 2014-10-27 16:06 CET
> ======================================================================
> Summary: Please add licences
> Description:
> Several libs come without a licence; this is a blocker for some OSs, most
> notably Debian. Please add them. If this can be done very soon, there
> is till a
> chanche of having OTB in next Debian stable, thus also on all Debian
> derivatives, without extra work.
> ======================================================================
>
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (0002506) pcav (reporter) - 2014-10-18 07:22
> http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981#c2506
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can use licensecheck in the package "devscripts" to check which
> licenses are used and update the debian/copyright file.
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
>
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (0002507) pcav (reporter) - 2014-10-20 08:14
> http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981#c2507
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ftpmaster found *several other* files with licenses / copyright which
> are not
> mentioned in debian/copyright. This needs to be fixed before we could
> upload
> again. The code copies would be acceptable to some extent if there
> would be no
> way around - if and only if their copyright would be properly specified.
>
> So somebody needs to go down the list which can be obtained by
>
> licensecheck -r *
>
> Ready to help if necessary.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (0002516) rashadkm (developer) - 2014-10-27 15:52
> http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981#c2516
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> copyright directory contains license information for thridparty
> libraries in otb
> http://hg.orfeo-toolbox.org/OTB/file/a90c8c2fb5d7/Copyright
>
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (0002517) rashadkm (developer) - 2014-10-27 16:06
> http://bugs.orfeo-toolbox.org/view.php?id=981#c2517
> - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/otb.git/tree/debian/control
>
> Another idea is to ignore some third party libs from Utilities/*
> Some of them are not used at all.
>
> Utilities/otbossim - libossim-dev
> Utilities/otbopenthreads - libopenthreads-dev
> Utilities/otbexpat - libexpat1-dev
> Utilities/otbossim - libossim-dev
> Utilities/otbmuparser - libmuparser-dev
> Utilities/otbkml - libkml-dev,libboost-graph-dev
> Utilities/tinyxmllib - libtinyxml-dev (not used in debian/control)
>
> Utilities/otbsiftfast ??
> Utilities/otbopenjpeg - AFAICT, If GDAL is built with openjpeg driver
> then this
> directory is not touched by OTB
>
> libgdal-dev (>= 1.10.0),
> libgeotiff-dev,
> libexpat1-dev,
> libopenthreads-dev,
> libboost-graph-dev,
> libkml-dev,
> libmuparser-dev,
> libopencv-dev,
> libossim-dev,
> libfftw3-dev,
>
> I am not sure about this approach in dealing with your license issues
> on debian.
>
>
> Maybe someone will have a better idea or there is no way other than
> including
> every licenses.
>
> Issue History
> Date Modified Username Field Change
>
> ======================================================================
> 2014-10-18 07:04 pcav New Issue
>
> 2014-10-18 07:22 pcav Note Added: 0002506
>
> 2014-10-20 08:14 pcav Note Added: 0002507
>
> 2014-10-27 15:52 rashadkm Note Added: 0002516
>
> 2014-10-27 16:06 rashadkm Note Added: 0002517
>
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlRPNFYACgkQ/NedwLUzIr593QCZAeCqLCCs0O5PzWq0Sx9slg+t
> 4t8AnRbHgLULpjpV7hUhW1WcZ3e9WcSg
> =OS7B
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 544F3457.8060409@faunalia.it">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 544F3457.8060409@faunalia.it
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: