Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)
On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:40:36AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:44:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>>> The intent to get GCC changed was mentioned in the bug reports a
>>>>> month ago.
>>>> Seeing the number of new bug reports that keep popping up I still
>>>> think the switch should be reverted. It was bad enough with all the
>>>> month old bugs still open, but with many new ones (plus the
>>>> misbuilds) I really don't think it's reasonable to waste yet more
>>>> time on this.
>> which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through
>> the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones.
> There were again some more in the last couple days. They should be tagged
>> Which misbuilds are you aware of? I don't see any tagged?
> I'm aware of syslinux. I assume there will be others.
ok, then please lets use the singlular for now.