Re: Re Re Xemacs needs help
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> writes:
>>> serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it
>>> violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package
>>> maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release.
>>> This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in unstable
>>> that should not yet go into testing.
>> Yes, but I don't think any package in unstable should ever be
>> permanently not fit for testing (temporary unsuitability is norma
> Do you have a reason, or is this mere personal opinion? If
> indeed you happen to have a technical reason, please share.
My opinion, influenced by that of the RM:
Don't worry, it's *in*-flammable.