[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re Re Xemacs needs help

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:

> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:33:49 -0800, Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> said: 
>> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
>>> serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it
>>> violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package
>>> maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release.
>>> This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in unstable
>>> that should not yet go into testing.
>> Yes, but I don't think any package in unstable should ever be
>> permanently not fit for testing (temporary unsuitability is norma
> 	Do you have a reason, or is this mere personal opinion? If
>  indeed you happen to have a technical reason, please share.

My opinion, influenced by that of the RM:

Don't worry, it's *in*-flammable.

Reply to: