[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re Xemacs needs help

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:41:45 -0800, Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> said: 

> Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr> writes:
>> Quoting Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>:
>>> > BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS
>>> > snapshots.  What distribution do you think it would fit the
>>> > best?:
>>> > - unstable
>>> > - experimental
>>> > - none of the above, a stagging area would be better
>>> Keep in mind that anything uploaded to unstable really should be
>>> fit for a stable Debian release (IMO anyway).
>> RC bugs prevent packages to enter testing.

> And that's an ugly kludge that should be used minimally and only
> temporarily (again IMO).

	Eh? How's it a kludge when it is in the definition of the
 Serious severity?

    is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it violates a
    "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's
    opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release.

	This severity is *designed* to allow packages to live in
 unstable that should not yet go into testing.

Am I elected yet?
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: