On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:51:03AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Wolfgang Schweer] > > By default, LTSP in wheezy uses LDM for diskless workstations. So > > sshfs is used to access home dirs -- same as with thin clients. > > Did they fix the sshfs problem I discovered in 2010? See > <URL: http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html > > for the details. No idea, some info: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 > I also found that sshfs was very slow compared to NFS, but it solve a > lot of access problems and might be worth it. Would be nice to know > how LTSP using sshfs handle load from several users. Using it as a single users, it's pretty fast -- no chance for me to do a multiple users test, though. As far as I know, there have been no issues reported to the ltsp developers list concerning this issue. Wolfgang
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature