Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:48:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201201301148.07002.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120130102012.GG3857@login1.uio.no>
References: <[🔎] 20120124121642.GL3857@login1.uio.no> <[🔎] 201201301111.55290.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 20120130102012.GG3857@login1.uio.no>

On Montag, 30. Januar 2012, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Given that we lived on 10.0.2.0/23 for 10 years,

point taken :)

> I believe it is too much work to do the switch from 10.0.0.0/8 all
> over now.  I believe we are better of by brushing up the subnet-change
> tool and leave such change to wheezy.

right, I agree.

Reply to:

References:
- A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
Next by Date: Experience with exams using Skolelinux?
Previous by thread: Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
Next by thread: Re: A problem with 10.0.0.0/8 as the backbone network and consumer routers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread