Hi, On Saturday 01 March 2008 15:47, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Either we make the package arch: any, and build on some or all archs, > > or we make it arch: all, and stop building on more than one arch. I > > believe you are discussing which list of architectures to support if > > it isn't arch: all, while at least I believed Andreas to discuss if we > > should convert the package to arch: all. Well, appearantly the package is indeed arch all, but builds a different package if build on different archs, which I consider a bug - or this is cleverly worked around by allways building a package modelled for i386 but labelled arch all ;) > Yep. If we have arch all we will end up with some missing Recommends > on certain not so good suported architectures. The question is whether > missing recommends will trigger bug reports or not. They will. Maybe not today, maybe not not even in Debian Edu, but then eventuelly in Debian Med or somewhere else. > IMHO they should not > be RC but I would not like to have unfixable bugs even with lower > priority. Yup :) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpDWM7UxAJyF.pgp
Description: PGP signature