Re: Debian Metadata Proposal -- draft rev.1.4
On Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 06:39:06PM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> > Maybe we can adopt some ideas from the docreg format (Adam, what about
> > "Date" instead "Update" and other renamings?).
>
> Yes, consistency is good. I thought 'update' wasn't a real element
> however??
Well, I like to know what "Subjects" have changed recently. It has nothing
to do with the final product DDH.
> Here's the field name changes I suggest, if you want consistency:
>
> Section -> Subject
> Heading -> Title
> Update -> *drop on final version*
Yes. Also "Update" -> "Date" for development version.
Nice to see you agree. I already proposed that in ddh-design.sgml (on cvs
since a few minutes, so I think you'll like it.
I didn't change the actual files yet (to avoid changing test program), but
big deal... s/Section:/Subject:/...
Oh, btw: We will generate the final version anyway via makefile from the
multiple files (debian.ddh, user.ddh, ...) so it is not a problem at all to
filter out "Date" information.
Marcus
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god." Debian GNU/Linux finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: