Re: finally end single-person maintainership
On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 11:01 +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/23/24 04:32, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
>
> > > > It could be argued that testing migration is a CI process. >>
> > > > Its a CI process at a way too late stage.
> > > Also, uploading to test a merge request is not the right thing to
> > > do.
>
> > If the archive is a VCS then uploading an untested package to
> > experimental
> > to run tools is pushing a commit to run CI.
> > *shrug*
>
> Yes, but unironically: experimental is a side branch, unstable is a
> MR,
> and testing is the main branch.
>
> It is entirely valid to be dissatisfied with the turnaround time of
> the
> existing CI, but what we're seeing here is the creation of a parallel
> structure with as-of-yet unclear scope.
You are wasting a lot of hardware resources we don't have by abusing
experimental as a CI. Don't do that.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: