Re: t64 suffix

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: t64 suffix
From: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 18:22:42 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20240523182242.jpytbs4f3drbbqua@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+7wUsyM48hmnR4F1Bf2v3bWjYVZauynaS1zqF0gRE65xXs53g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CA+7wUsyM48hmnR4F1Bf2v3bWjYVZauynaS1zqF0gRE65xXs53g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Mathieu (2024.05.23_18:14:20_+0000)
> What is expected from Debian packager now ?
> 
> 1. Remove the t64 suffix upon next version upload ?

You can remove it at the next SONAME transition (ABI bump)

> 2. Keep the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames lintian warning (for now) ?

That should only occur on architectures that weren't impacted by the t64
migration. I imagine t64 could be explicitly ignored in lintian (and
someone has probably filed a bug about that).

Stefano

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: t64 suffix
  - From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>

References:
- t64 suffix
  - From: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: finally end single-person maintainership
Next by Date: Re: finally end single-person maintainership
Previous by thread: t64 suffix
Next by thread: Re: t64 suffix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread