Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:47:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] ZRGdlbRrh3PrVjBY@durkon.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f5299055-f47b-4bbe-9f4a-86ffc0d819f0@pblackman.plus.com>
References: <[🔎] 7396980d-4eb3-4ad6-8488-fda05b9566eb@kamens.us> <[🔎] 9efdb520-3098-4083-921f-0af6c662e65d@pblackman.plus.com> <[🔎] 65ea96fb-409f-487a-b118-f19cd8af6e5c@kamens.us> <[🔎] f5299055-f47b-4bbe-9f4a-86ffc0d819f0@pblackman.plus.com>

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 02:44:19PM +0100, Peter B wrote:
> On 25/09/2023 14:25, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > 
> > So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to ###-done@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all?
> > 
> 
> It should work if the syntax is correct. The + character was missing.
Please read https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#tag

Reply to:

References:
- Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Previous by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread