Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
From: Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 14:44:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] f5299055-f47b-4bbe-9f4a-86ffc0d819f0@pblackman.plus.com>
Reply-to: peter@pblackman.plus.com
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 65ea96fb-409f-487a-b118-f19cd8af6e5c@kamens.us>
References: <[🔎] 7396980d-4eb3-4ad6-8488-fda05b9566eb@kamens.us> <[🔎] 9efdb520-3098-4083-921f-0af6c662e65d@pblackman.plus.com> <[🔎] 65ea96fb-409f-487a-b118-f19cd8af6e5c@kamens.us>

On 25/09/2023 14:25, Jonathan Kamens wrote:


So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to ###-done@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all?


It should work if the syntax is correct. The + character was missing.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>

References:
- Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Peter B <peter@pblackman.plus.com>
- Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
  - From: Jonathan Kamens <jik@kamens.us>

Prev by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by Date: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Previous by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Next by thread: Re: Control header sent with done email didn't do what I expected, should it have?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread