On 2/5/20 5:05 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > It should be on abuser Saying "abuser" is inflammatory, especially as no abuse has been proven. Please stop. > to explain that it was not possible to build a > service in a fully DFSG compliant manner Why is the current solution not DFSG compliant? > only from components provided by Debian. While I agree it would be better in Debian to use a Debian image instead of an Alpine one and to use Debian packages, that is separate from DFSG compliance and a much lower severity issue. -- Richard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature