On Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:25:29 AM AEDT intrigeri wrote:
> I'd love if you would use wording less morally/emotionally loaded than
> "excuse" here: for me at least, "excuse" is bound to the thought
> framework of guilt, accusation, and absolute right vs. absolute wrong.
> Framing the discussion this way can easily lead folks to react in
> a defensive, non-constructive way.
>
> Maybe, instead, you meant something like "what reason is there to do
> X?", or "why do you think this trade-off is the current best
> solution?" :)
Valid, thanks. Though you could have lectured us both on the tone we have
used as I was merely responding to rather aggressive reply.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Truth never damages a cause that is just.
-- Mahatma Gandhi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.