Re: opentmpfiles & opensysusers, and its use in the Debian policy
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:29:37PM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> The accepting of init scripts seemed to me like an essential piece of
> making sure those scripts would be present wherever they would be
> needed. Your suggestion above seems to provide a way to make it less
> essential, and thus would make moving forward easier and more practical.
> The only question is how to make sure that that other package would be
> present whenever a non-systemd init system is in use, and that seems
> like a simple matter of adding dependencies from the
> set-foo-as-active-init-system package for foo.
Those init-script would life in the package for openrc or sysvinit or
whatever you are just working on, because it is implementation to them.
Or you use the same systemd-service to own-format conversion, you need
anyway for the whole rest, and don't need to implement extra scripts at
all.
Bastian
--
There is an order of things in this universe.
-- Apollo, "Who Mourns for Adonais?" stardate 3468.1
Reply to: