[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: When acting as a service admin, it's official, no really.

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:51:09AM -0400, Marvin Renich wrote:
> * Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org> [191009 08:45]:
> > If we want to announce something, we announce it. Until we do something like
> > this: of course there can be a (temporary) veto. You can't expect us to allow
> > things that will break the service for everybody without stepping in.
> While that may be fine in general, when a team member speaks officially
> (and that was explicitly stated by Bastian in this case:
> > >     >> > Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin.
> ) on a public Debian list (or privately), it is up to the team to make
> each other aware; it is not up to others to use alternate channels to
> say "Hey, one of your team said X on devel.d.o".
> If Bastian's veto was not a permanent decision, that was not
> communicated at all, and it should have been.  I'm glad it has been
> clarified now.

At least to me, it was very obvious: the capacity problems of Salsa CI have
been described as temporary, thus I assumed the veto is 100% temporary as
well.  So we understood Bastian differently.

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol,
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1kg raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Filter out and throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake,
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ etc), let the drink age at least 3-6 months.

Reply to: