[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa

On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote:

> Sam Hartman:
> >>>>>> "Bastian" == Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> writes:
> > 
> >     Bastian> Hi Sam
> >     Bastian> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >     >> The Salsa CA pipeline is recommended.
> > 
> >     Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin.  With the CI
> >     Bastian> people we have to work through too much problems first.
> > 
> > [...]
> > I'll remove it from the next version.
> Please don't. It would be a shame if we would *not* recommend to use the
> awesome Salsa CI pipeline for automated continuous testing of package
> development. I applaud the Salsa-CI's team for their effort, it's a huge
> step forwart for Debians QA standards.
> I also honestly appreciate all the hard work that the Salsa admins put
> into running Salsa, but it's absolutely not acceptable how they try to
> missuse the power of their role by behaving as Salsa dictators.
They? Since noone Cced me, I wasn't even aware of this discussion. 

So please don't they unless it is something offical from the team (such
things will not hidden in a long thread).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: