On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Sam Hartman: > >>>>>> "Bastian" == Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> writes: > > > > Bastian> Hi Sam > > Bastian> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > > >> The Salsa CA pipeline is recommended. > > > > Bastian> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI > > Bastian> people we have to work through too much problems first. > > > > [...] > > I'll remove it from the next version. > > Please don't. It would be a shame if we would *not* recommend to use the > awesome Salsa CI pipeline for automated continuous testing of package > development. I applaud the Salsa-CI's team for their effort, it's a huge > step forwart for Debians QA standards. > > I also honestly appreciate all the hard work that the Salsa admins put > into running Salsa, but it's absolutely not acceptable how they try to > missuse the power of their role by behaving as Salsa dictators. They? Since noone Cced me, I wasn't even aware of this discussion. So please don't they unless it is something offical from the team (such things will not hidden in a long thread). Alex
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature