On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:37:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> Before we get there, we should first start autoremoving packages from > >> unstable, if we consider rc-buggy in unstable to be unacceptable. We > >> do have quite a bit of things in unstable, that are neither getting > >> fixed, nor getting removed. And are in this limbo state of "no longer > >> in testing.... no longer in stable.... no longer in old-stable... > >> still in unstable". > > > > I'm all for it. > > What harm are the packages doing sitting in unstable? Distributing them > does not have much point, but neither does removing them. > > If someone does want to come along and fix the package, having it pass > through NEW again is not a good use of ftpteam time. Sounds like NEW is the problem, not other parts? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature