[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:37:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> >> Before we get there, we should first start autoremoving packages from
> >> unstable, if we consider rc-buggy in unstable to be unacceptable. We
> >> do have quite a bit of things in unstable, that are neither getting
> >> fixed, nor getting removed. And are in this limbo state of "no longer
> >> in testing.... no longer in stable.... no longer in old-stable...
> >> still in unstable".
> >
> > I'm all for it.
> What harm are the packages doing sitting in unstable?  Distributing them
> does not have much point, but neither does removing them.
> If someone does want to come along and fix the package, having it pass
> through NEW again is not a good use of ftpteam time.
Sounds like NEW is the problem, not other parts?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: