Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> > On 2018/10/25 12:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: julia_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED"):
> >>> My main concern here is this: AFAICT this package has been REJECTed
> >>> solely for this reason. Why is this bug a reason for a REJECT ?
> >>> ISTM that it should be filed in the BTS and handled like a normal bug.
> >> Ping, ftpmaster ?
> Since you are cc'ing d-devel@, I'll chime in.
> I'm not sure I understand the first concern. The package name is libjulia1,
> which would indeed normally point to a libjulia.so.1 library. You ship this:
Thanks for the technical details, but this does not seem to answer my
question which is:
Why is any of this a reason for an ftpmaster REJECT ? I still think
all of this should be handled as bugs (possibly RC bugs) in the BTS
in the conventional way, after ACCEPT.
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.