On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:45:26PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 23, Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> wrote:Wouldn't it make more sense for mutt to just go «oh, no GPG installed, let's note that there are signatures here, but they can't be verified, since there's no GPG installed on the system» and let the user know that? No need to actually disable PGP support.Yes. Because this way the default configuration will be useful both before and after gnupg will have been installed.
That is sort-of what is happening for neomutt (20171215+dfsg.1-1) at least, it reports sh: 1: gpg: not found There's room for improvement there. mutt (1.9.2-1) is worse Error: verification failed: Unsupported protocol both with the default configurations. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.