Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:10:39 +0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20180924171039.GI1696@belkar.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87efdig8an.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
References: <[🔎] a389eebf-54d1-27a3-5538-5092457fd0d9@coucouf.fr> <[🔎] 20180924161351.GG1696@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] 87in2ug939.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 20180924162405.GH1696@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] 87efdig8an.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:38:24AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ideally, we would never reuse the name of a binary package for some
> unrelated piece of software
Indeed.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@coucouf.fr>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by Date: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Previous by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread