Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 21:13:51 +0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20180924161351.GG1696@belkar.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] a389eebf-54d1-27a3-5538-5092457fd0d9@coucouf.fr>
References: <[🔎] a389eebf-54d1-27a3-5538-5092457fd0d9@coucouf.fr>

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 10:53:04PM +0200, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> FTP masters rejected the upload of the new elisa 0.2.1-1 as the package has a
> lower version than the former Elisa project and they proposed bumping the epoch
> and reusing the name. 
I don't find this reasonable to be honest.
Unless it has some other reasons than just "lower version".

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

References:
- Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@coucouf.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by Date: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Previous by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread