Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"

To: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 23:13:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20180924211331.GA25684@fama>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87efdig8an.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>
References: <[🔎] a389eebf-54d1-27a3-5538-5092457fd0d9@coucouf.fr> <[🔎] 20180924161351.GG1696@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] 87in2ug939.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 20180924162405.GH1696@belkar.wrar.name> <[🔎] 87efdig8an.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>

On 2018-09-24 09:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ideally, we would never reuse the name of a binary package for some
> unrelated piece of software,

Nor source package. Why not "elisa-music-player" or whatever?

Reply to:

References:
- Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Aurélien COUDERC <coucouf@coucouf.fr>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>
- Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by Date: Bug#906183: Dependency change and upgrade
Previous by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Next by thread: Re: Bumping epoch and reusing package name "elisa"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread