On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:22:00PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 01:42:54PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > Of course, dgit is yet another workflow and my understanding is that > > git-buildpackage (without dgit) is far more commonly used in Debian. > > This isn't fair to dgit. While it does impose some minimal requirements > upon git trees, it is otherwise workflow neutral. This is evidenced by > the fact that there are already several distinct dgit-compatible > workflows documented in the dgit-maint-*(7) namespace. I re-read Ian's e-mail and realised I wasn't quite fair to you, either :) Ian did claim that dgit gives you one workflow for all Debian packages. It does indeed provide that. What I should have said was that it does not enforce /that/ workflow; it just makes it available, primarily for the benefit of NMUers and those who aren't already Debian contributors. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature