alias type forwarders WAS: SPAM
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:55:39AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14602 March 1977, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >> That would be the next step, DMARC, which is SPF plus DKIM plus some
> >> extra DNS records. And DMARC then allow to tell other mail servers (that
> >> follow DMARC) to get rid (spamfilter) mail that aren't from what your
> >> DNS says it should be from (or aren't signed correctly/at all). But its
> >> even more maintenance and burden for a group like Debian.
> > Is it even possible?
>
> Yes.
Nice
> > I was under the impression that DMARC plays very bad with mailing
> > lists. If I recall correctly, mailman has to modify mails that come
> > from a DMARC domain.
>
> The debian lists work. Alioth currently wouldn't, I think, but software
> could be upgraded.
>
> It has a different problem which is way worse: It breaks usual alias
> type forwarders, which are used *a lot* within Debian.
What are the ideas about changing those aliases into something
that wouldn't break by SPF, DKIM and such?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Vincent Danjean <vdanjean.ml@free.fr>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>