Re: SPAM
Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:36:58PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >I think the best explanation is that the entire message ??? complaint and
> >quoted part ??? were composed and sent by the spammer themselves.
>
> Oh, the "original" message is seperate, I just replied to a reply.
That doesn't contradict my explanation; I think both messages are
composed by the spammer.
That explanation could be wrong, but I'm convinced of it (tentatively)
so far.
--
\ “All television is educational television. The question is: |
`\ what is it teaching?” —Nicholas Johnson |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- References:
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>
- Re: SPAM
- From: The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org>
- Re: SPAM
- From: Christopher Clements <bcnjr5@gmail.com>