On ശനി 07 ജനുവരി 2017 09:30 വൈകു, Philip Hands wrote: > I've responded to a few of these ITPs and have found the responses I've > received suggest that you've chosen your recruits well, so it strikes me > as a shame that they are underselling themselves by submitting ITPs in > this state. I did not recruit anyone. The students signed up for the workshop and it was their vacation time. They spent 6 days of their vacation on this workshop itself shows their commitment. Also the college itself has a good tradition of Free Software culture. They hosted a mini debconf in 2010 and we did a second mini debconf there last year (in between they hosted many Free Software events including FUDCON Asia and they are hosting PyCon India next month). > It would probably help if they also wrote a line or two after the > descriptions about why they are packaging the package and/or any > concerns they might have about the wording or packaging. Doing that is > much more likely to attract useful suggestions than sending bare ITPs > with only (often rather dubious) short descriptions. > > I'm tempted to respond to each of these people's first ITP with some > suggestions, but you are much better placed to pass on advice to them, > so I think it would be better if you did it. I will pass on this to them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature