Re: ifupdown2: debconf followup
On 2016-08-01 16:43:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This seems reasonable. I think NM is a better choice than ifupdown for
> roaming client devices (e.g. laptops), and systemd-networkd is a good
> choice for "infrastructure" devices like servers and NAS boxes.
I don't have any problem with ifupdown on my laptops, where I can
use different configurations via virtual interfaces, depending on
the place I go (this is necessary due to broken modem-routers).
And for wifi, I want a GUI, so that I use wicd.
Vincent Lefèvre <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)