Re: ifupdown2: debconf followup
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:48:26 +0200, Guus Sliepen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> We should also think hard about switching to a new default since
>> currently many other major distributions are moving to NetworkManager
>> and/or systemd-networkd (which nowadays is usable, works well for
>> simpler use cases and will be installed on every Debian system anyway).
>Last time I looked at it, systemd-networkd required several
>configuration files just to bring up a single interface. I can't say it
>was a very user-friendly experience. But perhaps things are better now?
I don't know when you have looked at systemd-networkd for the last
time, but ever since I looked at it, the trivial case just needs a
And the clear distinction between layers and interfaces is one of the
biggest advantages of systemd-networkd over ifupdown since it's
friendly to configuration management systems.
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834