Re: Ad-hoc survey of existing Debian git integration tools
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:56:33 +0200, Vincent Bernat <email@example.com>
> ? 30 juillet 2015 11:54 +0100, Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> :
>>> > Do your published git branches contain the patches-applied or
>>> > patches-unapplied tree ?
>>> Without using "gbp pq", the published git branches are patches-unapplied
>> Then to use dgit push, you must use gbp pq.
>> Do you see why this is necessary, when the purpose is to provide a git
>> tree which is useful to someone who doesn't want to learn about your
>> specific patch system and workflow ?
>On the other hand, since the previous workflow was quilt, still using
>quilt is useful for someone who doesn't want to learn about specific git
Agreed. Additionally, my git/gbp workflow has blown up numerous times
with the patches applied. Since switching to patches unapplied, things
are just fine.
>Personally, I am waiting for the number of git-based workflows to
>decrease before settling for something else.
Agreed. It's a real pain to have a new workflow twice for each stable
release, it's killing valueable time and makes backporting a double
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834