❦ 15 avril 2015 13:47 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> : >>>>>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the >>>>>> concatenated but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my >>>>>> upstream's upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. >>>>>> During package build i use uglifyjs (which is already in Debian) >>>>>> to place minified copies where the app I'm building expects them >>>>>> to be. >>>>>> As mentioned above, what constitutes preferred form of >>>>>> modification really is a question of who is doing the >>>>>> modification. Upstream uses the un-concatenated files, but >>>>>> personally, I would find it easier to modify one big file, at >>>>>> least for something interpreted like javascript. >>>>> >>>>> What counts is the form preferred by the authors of the code. >>>> >>>> Who says that? We can't just invent new rules. >>> >>> That is exactly what we can - and do: We invented Debian Policy. >> >> Please, give a source. The Debian Policy doesn't say that what counts is >> the form preferred by the authors of the code. > > Ahh, I thought you were talking about "we" as in Debian. > > Sorry for the misunderstanding: I agree that you and I cannot make up > new rules in the middle of this conversation. Not sure if that helps > you in this conversation or elsewhere, but there you are. Fair enough, I didn't understand your remark this way. -- Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. -- Mark Twain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature