Quoting Vincent Bernat (2015-04-15 13:26:59) > ❦ 15 avril 2015 11:07 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> : > >>>>> What I have done so far in my package is to include the >>>>> concatenated but unminified js from the upstream (that would be my >>>>> upstream's upstream) source tarball in debian/missing-sources. >>>>> During package build i use uglifyjs (which is already in Debian) >>>>> to place minified copies where the app I'm building expects them >>>>> to be. >>>>> As mentioned above, what constitutes preferred form of >>>>> modification really is a question of who is doing the >>>>> modification. Upstream uses the un-concatenated files, but >>>>> personally, I would find it easier to modify one big file, at >>>>> least for something interpreted like javascript. >>>> >>>> What counts is the form preferred by the authors of the code. >>> >>> Who says that? We can't just invent new rules. >> >> That is exactly what we can - and do: We invented Debian Policy. > > Please, give a source. The Debian Policy doesn't say that what counts is > the form preferred by the authors of the code. Ahh, I thought you were talking about "we" as in Debian. Sorry for the misunderstanding: I agree that you and I cannot make up new rules in the middle of this conversation. Not sure if that helps you in this conversation or elsewhere, but there you are. Have a nice day, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature