On 11/08/2014 at 10:57 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > In the end it's quite easy: sysvinit has many deficiencies ans > missing feature, systemd is superior in all places. On 11/09/2014 at 12:01 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > All of these systems were capable of booting a Linux,... and you > really think one of them would have won sooner or later by technical > evolution? I doubt. The technical superior system was IMHO rather > clear from the beginning,... and it were political reasons that > prevented it from winning immediately. If you're *trying* to turn this into yet another systemd flamewar thread, you're certainly using the right sort of rhetoric. On 11/09/2014 at 01:28 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Please actually read Joey's message to understand his concern, which > is not at all about content or systemd, but the harmful actions of > some project members and the complicity of others in those actions > over some significant time now. Agreed. (Or IHO harmful, at least - I'm not taking a position on that myself, not least because I probably haven't seen most of the actions in question.) -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature