Re: Technical committee acting in gross violation of the Debian constitution
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:27 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > >>>>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> writes:
> >
> > […]
> >
> > > The second part, making systemd portable, has already been widely
> > > discussed. There are significant technical reasons why systemd is
> > > Linux only. And the potential "recepients", like BSD, don't seem to
> > > be interested anyway.
> >
> > Unless I be mistaken, that also /does/ mean Debian. That is:
> > Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd.
> Yes, the technical reasons apply. The other reasons apply too, I think:
> /kFreeBSD and /Hurd ports are interested in staying close to their
> upstream projects and certainly don't have the manpower to take on
> systemd porting on their own.
>
> > Sorry for jumping into this discussion without any thorough
> > reading, but I have mentioned this point a few times already at
> > (other) mailing lists and on IRC, so if I got it wrong, I’d like
> > to be corrected, so that I won’t spread confusion any further.
> Please don't do that. Those threads are long enough already, without
> rehashing things which can be googled in 30s.
The best for kFreeBSD and Hurd would be to abandoning the Debian ship.
It is sinking :( (just let the devuan people get things in order first)
Reply to: