Re: Technical committee acting in gross violation of the Debian constitution
>>>>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> writes:
[…]
> The second part, making systemd portable, has already been widely
> discussed. There are significant technical reasons why systemd is
> Linux only. And the potential "recepients", like BSD, don't seem to
> be interested anyway.
Unless I be mistaken, that also /does/ mean Debian. That is:
Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd.
Sorry for jumping into this discussion without any thorough
reading, but I have mentioned this point a few times already at
(other) mailing lists and on IRC, so if I got it wrong, I’d like
to be corrected, so that I won’t spread confusion any further.
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
Reply to: