Re: Technical committee acting in gross violation of the Debian constitution
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0000, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> >>>>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> writes:
>
> […]
>
> > The second part, making systemd portable, has already been widely
> > discussed. There are significant technical reasons why systemd is
> > Linux only. And the potential "recepients", like BSD, don't seem to
> > be interested anyway.
>
> Unless I be mistaken, that also /does/ mean Debian. That is:
> Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/Hurd.
Yes, the technical reasons apply. The other reasons apply too, I think:
/kFreeBSD and /Hurd ports are interested in staying close to their
upstream projects and certainly don't have the manpower to take on
systemd porting on their own.
> Sorry for jumping into this discussion without any thorough
> reading, but I have mentioned this point a few times already at
> (other) mailing lists and on IRC, so if I got it wrong, I’d like
> to be corrected, so that I won’t spread confusion any further.
Please don't do that. Those threads are long enough already, without
rehashing things which can be googled in 30s.
Zbyszek
> FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A
Ah, you're not really looking for answers. Why didn't you put
that in a more visible place, and not in the footer so I only see it
after writing a response?
[A purely rhetorical question, no need to answer.]
Reply to: