On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:32:07PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 18:18 +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > [...] > > * There were concerns about accessibility support, "particularly for the > > blind"[2]. > [...] > > Which is unfortunately quite bad in most free graphical desktop > environments. Is it actually a strength of Xfce? I didn't think it > was. I just realized my statement was unclear. I believe some people had stated that GNOME had regressed in accessibility support at the time, and XFCE was a better choice in this regard. I can't say more because I don't have enough knowledge on the subject. Maybe someone else can. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature