Re: pulseaudio related problems....
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:37:31AM +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> On 18/02/2014 10:57, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 18 February 2014 09:33, Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:09:11AM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >>> Is it not? It's much more convenient than fighting with a broken audio
> >>> server which was written by a bunch of not really sane people suffering
> >>> from some extreme form of a NIH syndrome.
> >
> >> I think that attacking people isn't a good way to make one's point, or
> >> to foster a constructive discussion. It also makes me, and probably
> >> other people, feel uninterested in participating in any discussions on
> >> this and other Debian mailing lists.
> >
> > Sorry if that looked like an attack. Probably that was a very poor
> > choice of words.
> >
> > However, my point is still that I can't see how said server improves
> > the situation, my feeling is that it makes it only worse.
> >
>
> This is obviously a feeling. Facts would be better.
I'm yet another of the herd who found that pulse was broken out of the
box, and that removing it made things work immediately. In fact, it's
only worked on one out of the several systems I've tried it on, and even
there it was sufficiently annoying that it lasted only a few hours.
I'd say that whatever might be said of its benefits, it's been a net
negative overall for me, and I'd be quite happy for it to go away
entirely.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
`- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800
Reply to: