Re: removal of the vacation package
Bjørn Mork <email@example.com> writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Bjørn Mork <email@example.com> writes:
>>> Is there such a beast with feature parity? vacation has a few nice
>>> defaults, like ignoring list mails and only sending one message per week
>>> to each receiver. Having every end user implement similar behaviour in
>>> sieve isn't likely to happen.
>>> The world has become a lot more stupid since vacation was written....
>> The statement in the second paragraph is false.
> OK, then I got the wrong impression from the number of "out of office"
> messages I see on public mailing lists.
Yes. That might just be a larger sample size: your sample consists of
people who are subscribed to public mailing lists. This number depends
>> This also answers the first paragraph.
> Care to provide a pointer to an example?
RFC 5230, sections 4.2, 4.5, 4.6 and 8.