[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: removal of the vacation package



On Jan 12, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:

> It still seems to have a fair number of loyal users though. I see your
popcon says 1867 have it installed, but only 222 "voted".

> If we do have such a
> replacement (I just don't know) please mention it in the removal bug
> report.
I agree with waldi that the most simple replacement is a Sieve-enabled 
LDA.  

On Jan 12, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

> I might want to adopt it.  What's wrong with it not supporting
> MIME ?  AFAIAA it doesn't need to do much parsing of the incoming
> messages.
As the last bug shows, it is supposed to parse the Subject header.

> The set of bugs looks tractable to me.  Do you have a half-prepared
> upload somewhere or is the versionn in the archive the most recent ?
No, I have really ignored it since december 2003.
If you want it, it's yours.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: